How effective is the combination of your main product (video) and ancillary texts (digipak/website)?
I feel the combination of our video and digipak/website are very strong, comparatively. The video, itself, was created to show a type of imbalance in attention, as Dan Davids was given more screen time and focus compared to Arcane. With the video alone, a new viewer would assume that Dan Davids was the main artist as he is the one consistently seen from beginning to end.
Having said that, to the fans that recognise both Arcane and Dan Davids, they'd realise as he's the producer, he's shown in order to make him seem like he's any other person in the video. In response, however, for the album cover, I intentionally put the both of them on there in a sense of irony. To the newer viewers that would've thought "what's the significance of this person?", they're now seeing that same person on the front of the album cover. I feel this is very effective, as stated in question 1, it's not 100% common in electronic music to have images of the artists on the album cover. Therefore, it would theoretically be Dan Davids on the album covers, but I decided to go against that convention, commonly found in pop music.


Factors of synergy that were used, were the Arcane eye and both artists making appearances on the covers and in the music video. In order to maintain the continuity with all of the products, we realised it would've been best to keep both artists making an appearance in one way or another. On the other hand, for the website, I specifically intended to have only the Arcane eye on the website as it was my best way to remain minimal and focused on the content, similar to Calvin Harris' website.
The combination of the website, the digipak and the video, in my opinion, turned out to be very strong. The video matched the standards of industry music videos, the digipak kept that level of quality up, and I feel the overall package from all of the products turned out to be very strong, high-quality and effective in cohesion.